Fiscal consolidation plan and public enterprise management consolidation plan

Niseko Town, the five-year fiscal consolidation plan and the sound management of public enterprises in FY2007 will be implemented in order to redeem public funds borrowed at high interest rates (5% or more per year) and reduce future financial burden. We have a plan.

Niseko Town, a financial consolidation plan and a public enterprise management consolidation plan (hereinafter referred to as a “financial consolidation plan, etc.”) related to the early redemption of local government bonds (debt) from the public fund compensation exemption were prepared, and Received the approval of the Minister. Along with this, in Honmachi, we will reduce the financial burden by redeeming the public funds with high interest rates (5% or more annually) sequentially and work on further improving the efficiency of administrative administration.
Plan period: Heisei er 2007 - Heisei er 2011 (5 years)

The full text of fiscal consolidation plan etc can be seen from here.

The government is urging the municipalities that make early redemption to ensure that the administrative reforms shown in the fiscal consolidation plan etc. are executed reliably. Therefore, as soon as the settlement amount for fiscal consolidation is known each fiscal year, it is necessary to promptly reflect the amount in the plan and confirm the progress of the plan. In addition, if you do not reach the target value of administrative reform determined by the plan, you must analyze the cause in detail, and take necessary measures to achieve the target.

As for the enforcement situation in FY 2011, which is the final year of planning, general accounting failed to achieve the planned target value (degree of achievement of administrative reform), but simple water consumption accounting can show improvement effect exceeding planned target value It was.
At the time of formulating the plan, it was a fiscal austerity plan, but in addition to the rise in the local allocation tax, aggressive fiscal-sponsored policies have increased due to the policy change through Mayor's change in fiscal year 2009, so planning of general account can not be achieved was.
Although the plan has ended, we will continue making efforts to save expenses.

Fiscal consolidation plan (general account)

• Improvement effect amount (FY 2011): Planned value 33.8 million yen → Actual value △ 76,800,000 yen

[Main Factors] As a result of the policy change to active fiscal spending by the Mayor's election in FY 2009, an increase in the number of staff, personnel expenses, an increase in contributions to the benefit cost of members of the Town Assembly Mutual Aid Association due to the system revision . Personnel expenses increase expenses (officials with terms of office, international exchange workers, community support staff, school part-time lecturers, staff salary original reduction abolition etc.)

• Degree of achievement of improvement amount in overall plan:

It was 53.9 million yen against the improvement target of 133 million yen in five years. Achievement rate 40.5%

• Real debt cost ratio: planned value 16.6% → actual value 14.5%

Achieved an improvement of 2.1% below planned value

Public enterprise management consolidation plan (simple water business accounting)

• Improvement effect amount (FY 2011): planned value 6.6 million yen → actual amount 9 million yen

[Main Factors] According to the fact that one person's labor cost was transferred to public sewer system special account in FY 2009

• Degree of achievement of improvement amount in overall plan:

It was 39.7 million yen against the improvement target of 13.7 million yen in five years. Achievement rate 289.8%

As for the execution situation in FY 2010, general accounting was not able to achieve the planned target value (achievement level of administrative reform), but simple water supply accounting was able to show improvement effect exceeding plan target value.
Fiscal consolidation plan (general account)

• Amount of improvement effect (FY 2010): Planned value 11 million yen → Actual amount △ 15 million yen

[Main factors] Although improvement of 33 million yen by staff personnel expenses, expenses outside the standard for the simplified water service special account exceeded the planned value by 48 million yen. This deposit is due to the National Economic Measures Temporary Grant Project (Maintenance System Maintenance System of Simplified Water Facilities).

• Degree of achievement of improvement amount in the whole plan (until FY 2011):

Achieved an improvement of 97.7% in FY 2010 compared to the improvement target of 133 million yen in 5 years

• Real public debt cost ratio: planned value 17.1% → actual value 14.7%

Achieved an improvement of 2.4% below planned value

Public enterprise management consolidation plan (simple water business accounting)

• Improvement effect amount (FY 2010): Planned value 1 million yen → Actual value 9.6 million yen

[Main Factors] According to the fact that one person's labor cost was transferred to public sewer system special account in FY 2009

• Degree of achievement of improvement amount in the whole plan (until FY 2011):

Achieved an improvement of 230.6% in FY 2010 compared to the improvement target of 13.7 million yen in 5 years

The execution situation of the fiscal year 2009 was able to show improvement effect that both general account and simple water supply accounting exceeded the planned target value (degree of achievement of administrative reform).

Fiscal consolidation plan (general account)

• Improvement effect amount (FY 2009): planned value 13 million yen → actual amount 65 million yen

[Main Factor] Because restraint of staff personnel expenses was larger than planned value

• Degree of achievement of improvement amount in the whole plan (until FY 2011):

Achieved an improvement of 109.0% in FY 2009 compared to the improvement target of 133 million yen in 5 years

• Real debt cost ratio: planned value 16.7% → actual value 15.4%

Achieved an improvement of 1.3% below planned value

Public enterprise management consolidation plan (simple water business accounting)

• Amount of improvement effect (FY 2009): Planned value 100,000 yen → Actual amount 12.7 million yen

【Main Factors】 Reduction of maintenance and management expenses by transferring personnel expenses for one person to the public sewer system special account and by endeavoring to manage effective facilities

• Degree of achievement of improvement amount in the whole plan (until FY 2011):

Achieved an improvement of 163.5% in FY 2009 compared to the improvement target of 13.7 million yen in 5 years

The execution situation of the fiscal year 2008 was able to show improvement effect exceeding the planned target value for both general accounts and simple water supply accounting (degree of achievement of administrative reform).

Fiscal consolidation plan (general account)

• Improvement effect amount (FY2008): planned value 41 million yen → actual amount 43 million yen

[Main Factor] Because restraint of staff personnel expenses was larger than planned value

• Degree of achievement of improvement amount in the whole plan (until FY 2011):

Achieved an improvement of 60.2% in FY 2008 compared to the improvement target of 133 million yen in 5 years

• Real debt cost ratio: planned value 17.3% → actual value 16.6%

Achieved an improvement of 0.7% below planned value

Public enterprise management consolidation plan (simple water business accounting)

• Improvement effect amount (FY2008): Planned value 3 million yen → Actual value 4.3 million yen

[Main Factors] Reduction in maintenance and maintenance expenses by endeavoring to manage effective facilities

• Degree of achievement of improvement amount in the whole plan (until FY 2011):

Achieved an improvement of 70.8% in FY 2008 against the improvement target of 13.7 million yen in five years

We were able to demonstrate the effect of improving the execution situation in fiscal year 2007 (degree of achievement of administrative reform) exceeding the planned target value for both general accounts and simple water supply accounting.

Fiscal consolidation plan (general account)

• Improvement effect (FY2007): Planned value: 34.6 million yen → Actual value: 37.4 million yen

[Main Factor] Because restraint of staff personnel expenses was larger than planned value

• Degree of achievement of improvement amount in the whole plan (until FY 2011):

Achieved an improvement of 28.1% in FY 2007 compared to the improvement target of 133 million yen in 5 years

• The actual public bond cost ratio can not achieve the target target value by 0.1 points (planned value 17.7% → actual value 17.8%)

The target value after next fiscal year is expected to be achieved

Public enterprise management consolidation plan (simple water business accounting)

• Amount of improvement effect (FY2007): Planned value 3 million yen → Actual value 5.4 million yen

【Main Factors】 Reduction in maintenance and management expenses by endeavoring to manage effective facilities · Degree of achievement of improvement amount throughout the plan (until FY 2011):
Achieved an improvement of 39.4% in FY 2007 compared to the improvement target of 13.7 million yen in 5 years